International Affairs

UK Sanctions on Israeli Settlements Trigger Diplomatic Rift with Israel Amidst Nuanced US Stance

The United Kingdom has imposed sanctions on illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, leading to a swift and strong retaliation from Israel. The move has sparked a diplomatic row, with Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband defending the decision while Israel accused the UK of hostile actions. Notably, US President Donald Trump did not object to the British plans during a call with Prime Minister Andy Burnham, though the US has not joined the sanctions.

By Alex Beauregard | 9 September 2026
From above of small flags of Israel on toothpicks placed on white surface

The United Kingdom has initiated a trade ban on goods from illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and imposed sanctions on individuals and firms providing services to settlers, a move that has escalated diplomatic tensions in the region.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced the measures on Tuesday, stating they were designed to make a "substantive difference" to the situation on the ground. The decision has prompted immediate and strong retaliation from Israel, including the closure of the British consulate in Jerusalem and a ban on 12 British officials, including former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, from entering the country.

In a notable development, US President Donald Trump reportedly did not oppose the UK's plans during a phone call with Prime Minister Andy Burnham earlier this week. A Western official briefed on the call stated, "There was no request to hold off." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also avoided direct criticism of the ban, although he made it clear that the United States would not join the UK and 11 other countries that have followed suit in sanctioning Israel.

Mr Rubio explained the US position, stating, "We were made aware that they are gonna make this decision. We heard their arguments as to why. We share the goal of stability. We don’t want to see an uptick in violence or tensions in the West Bank in a tenuous time in the region."

Foreign Secretary Miliband detailed the mechanism of the new sanctions, explaining that the trade ban "will be based on the postcodes of settlements, and companies that import to this country will have to vouch for where in the in Israel these products are coming from." He also indicated an intention to sanction companies "that might be engaging in the occupied territories," aiming to "have an impact on the services that are provided to expand the occupation."

Mr Miliband defended the government's stance, asserting that the UK should have "acted sooner" to implement these measures. He denied that the decision was influenced by upcoming Israeli elections, telling BBC Radio 4, "I don't think we, as a British government, can outsource our moral and political responsibilities." He added, "It’s for the Israeli people to elect their government. We want a thriving Israel. We want a prosperous Israel, and we want an Israeli government we can work with."

In response to the UK's actions, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar stated that the Labour government "has left us no choice but to respond to its hostile actions." The Foreign Secretary, meanwhile, accused Israel of "turning a blind eye" to what he described as the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians under increasing pressure to relocate from settlers in the West Bank.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham affirmed Britain's commitment to "act in support of our values," stating that the "suffering of the Palestinian people is a scar on the conscience of the world."

The UK's decision has also generated debate domestically. Chief Rabbi of the UK Sir Ephraim Mirvis described Mr Miliband’s sanctions as a “truly dark day for British Jews,” accusing the government of ignoring “the deep concerns expressed by so many of us.” He added that such sanctions do “nothing to advance the cause of peace. Nor do they make anyone safer – quite the contrary.”

However, Mr Miliband, who identifies as a "proud British Jew," rejected the Chief Rabbi's assessment. Speaking to Sky News and Jewish News, he asserted, "I don't agree with the Chief Rabbi... I believe that it must be possible to do what we did yesterday, which is to stand up for British values of the rule of law, of dignity for people, of the prevention of injustice." He also strongly condemned any attempt to hold British Jews responsible for the actions of the Israeli government, labelling it "anti-Semitism, pure and simple."

When questioned about the international community's reaction, particularly from Washington, Mr Miliband suggested a growing frustration with the Israeli government. While declining to speak for the US directly, he told Sky News, "I think the whole international community, let me say this, has been quite frustrated, to put it mildly, with some of the actions of the Israeli government."

Despite acknowledging that the Israeli government’s response would be "damaging," Mr Miliband maintained that the UK had made the right decision. "I regret what the Israeli government has announced, but I'm proud of what we did yesterday, and it was the right thing to do," he said. "Overall, I strongly believe that what we did, along with other international allies, was absolutely the right thing to do."

In a separate comment during the discussions, Mr Miliband also expressed understanding for Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to stand down as an MP after resigning as prime minister, acknowledging the difficulty for former leaders to return to the backbenches. He suggested, "I don't think we've seen the last of Keir Starmer in public service in one form or another."